TSTP Solution File: NUM751^1 by Duper---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : NUM751^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 10:57:29 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.79s 4.01s
% Output   : Proof 3.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem    : NUM751^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Fri Aug 25 12:27:57 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.79/4.01  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.79/4.01  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (moref x y) True
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Xx Xy Xz Xu : frac), moref Xx Xy → eq Xx Xz → eq Xy Xu → moref Xz Xu) True
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Xx Xy Xz : frac), moref Xx Xy → moref (pf Xx Xz) (pf Xy Xz)) True
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #3 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Xx Xy : frac), eq (pf Xx Xy) (pf Xy Xx)) True
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #4 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (moref (pf z x) (pf z y))) True
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #5 (by clausification #[4]): Eq (moref (pf z x) (pf z y)) False
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #6 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a : frac), Eq (∀ (Xy : frac), eq (pf a Xy) (pf Xy a)) True
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a a_1 : frac), Eq (eq (pf a a_1) (pf a_1 a)) True
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #8 (by clausification #[1]): ∀ (a : frac), Eq (∀ (Xy Xz Xu : frac), moref a Xy → eq a Xz → eq Xy Xu → moref Xz Xu) True
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #9 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a a_1 : frac), Eq (∀ (Xz Xu : frac), moref a a_1 → eq a Xz → eq a_1 Xu → moref Xz Xu) True
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : frac), Eq (∀ (Xu : frac), moref a a_1 → eq a a_2 → eq a_1 Xu → moref a_2 Xu) True
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #11 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : frac), Eq (moref a a_1 → eq a a_2 → eq a_1 a_3 → moref a_2 a_3) True
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #12 (by clausification #[11]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : frac), Or (Eq (moref a a_1) False) (Eq (eq a a_2 → eq a_1 a_3 → moref a_2 a_3) True)
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #13 (by clausification #[12]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : frac), Or (Eq (moref a a_1) False) (Or (Eq (eq a a_2) False) (Eq (eq a_1 a_3 → moref a_2 a_3) True))
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #14 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : frac),
% 3.79/4.01    Or (Eq (moref a a_1) False) (Or (Eq (eq a a_2) False) (Or (Eq (eq a_1 a_3) False) (Eq (moref a_2 a_3) True)))
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #16 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : frac), Eq (∀ (Xy Xz : frac), moref a Xy → moref (pf a Xz) (pf Xy Xz)) True
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #17 (by clausification #[16]): ∀ (a a_1 : frac), Eq (∀ (Xz : frac), moref a a_1 → moref (pf a Xz) (pf a_1 Xz)) True
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #18 (by clausification #[17]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : frac), Eq (moref a a_1 → moref (pf a a_2) (pf a_1 a_2)) True
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #19 (by clausification #[18]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : frac), Or (Eq (moref a a_1) False) (Eq (moref (pf a a_2) (pf a_1 a_2)) True)
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #20 (by superposition #[19, 0]): ∀ (a : frac), Or (Eq (moref (pf x a) (pf y a)) True) (Eq False True)
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #22 (by clausification #[20]): ∀ (a : frac), Eq (moref (pf x a) (pf y a)) True
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #23 (by superposition #[22, 14]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : frac),
% 3.79/4.01    Or (Eq True False) (Or (Eq (eq (pf x a) a_1) False) (Or (Eq (eq (pf y a) a_2) False) (Eq (moref a_1 a_2) True)))
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #28 (by clausification #[23]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : frac), Or (Eq (eq (pf x a) a_1) False) (Or (Eq (eq (pf y a) a_2) False) (Eq (moref a_1 a_2) True))
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #29 (by superposition #[28, 7]): ∀ (a a_1 : frac), Or (Eq (eq (pf y a) a_1) False) (Or (Eq (moref (pf a x) a_1) True) (Eq False True))
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #30 (by clausification #[29]): ∀ (a a_1 : frac), Or (Eq (eq (pf y a) a_1) False) (Eq (moref (pf a x) a_1) True)
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #31 (by superposition #[30, 7]): ∀ (a : frac), Or (Eq (moref (pf a x) (pf a y)) True) (Eq False True)
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #32 (by clausification #[31]): ∀ (a : frac), Eq (moref (pf a x) (pf a y)) True
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #33 (by superposition #[32, 5]): Eq True False
% 3.79/4.01  Clause #38 (by clausification #[33]): False
% 3.79/4.01  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------